How has your taste changed over the years when it comes to romance books?
Other than the few BLAZE Harlequins, the first romance books I read was a breed book by Lora Leigh and Fifty Shade's of Gray. My serious romance reading started about 9-10 years ago. The ones I don't read much anymore are motorcycle, BDSM (though I still have my favorite go to authors) and I don't find myself picking up a lot of Mafia books. That's not to say I don't read those subject at all, it's just not something I seek out anymore.
I'm finding I like more of the slow burn. I want more storyline than constant sex. After nearly 10 years of sex scenes I find myself skipping over a good chunk of them so I can move on to the actual story.
I'm finding I like more of the slow burn. I want more storyline than constant sex. After nearly 10 years of sex scenes I find myself skipping over a good chunk of them so I can move on to the actual story.
Yes, my taste has changed a great deal.
I'm the same way. I don't mind tasteful sex in books but the days of saying "hello" and ending up sleeping together within 10 minutes do nothing for me anymore. I much prefer a good storyline, slow burns are the best. I didn't read romance books until 20 or 25 yrs ago and then I started with Julie Garwood. I loved Regency books but for the past few years I've been enjoying romantic suspense or contemporary romance. I went through a period where I read every Pride and Prejudice variation I could find but again, not so much anymore. Speaking of motorcycle books my favorites are by Lauren Gilley ( Fearless: The Complete Novel (Dartmoor Book 1) by Lauren Gilley (Kindle Edition)) and all of the books that follow. I received an email from her that she has another book in her Lean Dog Legacy Series that will be out next year! Yea! She's been writing a PNR series, not my cup of tea.
To be honest I almost wish my taste would change back to the Regency/historical books as so many are mentioned here.
Last Edit: Dec 9, 2019 14:58:19 GMT -7 by Banana Boat: eta
I still primarily read PNR, dystopian and Sci-fi. I don't read as many insta-lust stories as I have in the past. I go more for a good story with a strong romantic element as opposed to a book about sex with little story. I'm a bit more selective than I was in the past. I never was a big fan of YA, NA, historicals, BDSM, second chances, motorcycle clubs or mafia stories. There are some exceptions, of course. I'll read MC books by Susan Fanetti or Paula Marinaro. I enjoyed some of Kristen Ashley's earlier books. I like J.D. Robb. I liked Deanna Raybourn's books. It's been ages since I read a Jordan Silver book. No matter how smutty and trashy I'll still read new releases from Kaitlyn O'Connor and Laurann Dohner. I do miss Charlotte Boyett-Compo, I liked her Reaper series. I'm always on the lookout for a new author to try,
This is a great question. I just started looking at my recent buys and at my library and comparing the books. I think my tastes have broadened and if the younger me could see what I am into now she would blush and hide away, I used to read mostly fantasy or Harlequin romance. Now I rarely read new Harlequin published books and re-read the ones I still own.
My tastes have changed that I am now limited to a few genres in romance, where as previously I read many such as Medieval, Highlanders, Shifters/PNR, SciFi from early 90s till 2001. The only Highland theme bks I read now are Time Travel. Also since Freebies started for Kindle Fire in 2011 I started reading CR and also found Harlequin and sorry I didn't start reading romance until the 90s. Prior to the 1990s I only read non-fiction/biographies.
There are some authors I no longer read such as Grace Burrows and is a personal reason about a descriptive word she used for a group of people in one of her bks and I didn't like her response to my email so this has turned me off to spend my money on her books.
Here comes the sun even though I love that rainy day feeling!
My tastes have changed, but I've been reading romances for at least 50 years; the books have changed as well! I was reading what I could find in romances; they were pretty tame but still good such as Phyllis Whitney, Mary Stewart, Victoria Holt. Oh, I inhaled those books! and then there were the Harlequins. I really didn't like them; way back then, the gals only were secretaries, teachers or worked with young children, and they just about died when the H frowned at them! I kept wanting girls with backbones & willing to branch out in their lives.
Happily, 2 things happened; mid-70's I discovered the bodice rippers (Woodiwiss, McBain, Lindsey, etc. I never cared for Rogers), and a few years later Silhouette started publishing! HOORAYY! I was buying all the Silhouette Desires & Intimate Moments, plus several of the other lines. Since then, I don't enjoy the old bodice rippers that much; little too much awareness now, and of the contemporaries back then; I keep getting caught on the smoking & the technology differences! Gal was in trouble the other day; I thought pull out your cell phone! (written before cell phones existed!) But some of the authors; worth it! This is where I met Krentz, Lowell, Estrada, Browning, Roberts....
Now, I read almost anything except High school/young adult (I have no wish to endure their angst again!--probably one of the reasons I don't like Taylor Swift!) and cheating. If the h or H cheat on each other; I drop the book. And I'm afraid I don't care if they're separated or getting a divorce, they're still married (until after the divorce is finalized)! I read historical, all eras, contemporary, romantic suspense, paranormal, BDSM, MFM & most other letter arrangements, science fiction, fantasy, etc. But I read most of those types back in the 70's also. Well, couldn't find the BDSM & letter arrangements back then...probably didn't know where to look! Oh, & a friend of mine was under orders to get to my kindles before my Mom; that's where the wilder stuff went (BDSM, letter arrangements, & insta-lust as you gals call it)
SO don't know that my tastes have changed that much; more that the books have changed in availability & focus. And yes, some of the love scenes do seem to go on too long & I want the story to keep moving; I do skim them a bit sometimes, esp. in rereads!
Happily, 2 things happened; mid-70's I discovered the bodice rippers (Woodiwiss, McBain, Lindsey, etc. I never cared for Rogers), and a few years later Silhouette started publishing! HOORAYY! I was buying all the Silhouette Desires & Intimate Moments, plus several of the other lines. Since then, I don't enjoy the old bodice rippers that much; little too much awareness now, and of the contemporaries back then; I keep getting caught on the smoking & the technology differences! Gal was in trouble the other day; I thought pull out your cell phone! (written before cell phones existed!) But some of the authors; worth it! This is where I met Krentz, Lowell, Estrada, Browning, Roberts....
Your comment about what was once contemporary is now outdated made me laugh.
I read Flash by Jayne Ann Krentz, which was published in 1998, and some of the things that pulled me out of the story was floppy disks & Fredrick's of Hollywood. (Today's reference would be Victoria's Secret)
In Sanctuary by Nora Roberts , published in 1997, we had smoking, developing and hanging negatives (now we're digital), Annie Lennox was a singer reference and Jane Fonda's workout tapes were mentioned!!
To think that was only 22 years ago. Well, I say "only" because life is flying by waaaaay too fast.
My tastes change every few weeks or months. I mostly stick to one kind of book for a while, whether it is by genre, or trope, or writing style. Even my taste regarding clean or erotica goes in cycles. What can I say? I am fickle.
The great thing about this is that, when I rediscover a trope, I have tons of new books that have come out (hopefully), AND I have tons of old books to reread. The bad thing of course, is that I lose track of which books I liked and which not, so there are books I remember that I can't find, and books that I forgot out of self-preservation that I try again.
All in all though, it is a good time to be a romance reader!
In Sanctuary by Nora Roberts , published in 1997, we had smoking, developing and hanging negatives (now we're digital), Annie Lennox was a singer reference and Jane Fonda's workout tapes were mentioned!!
Yep, at least she'd updated in NR's The Obsession That one, the h is shooting/producing digital, but does mention that she sometimes use the older formats.
I still primarily read PNR, dystopian and Sci-fi. I don't read as many insta-lust stories as I have in the past. I go more for a good story with a strong romantic element as opposed to a book about sex with little story. I'm a bit more selective than I was in the past. I never was a big fan of YA, NA, historicals, BDSM, second chances, motorcycle clubs or mafia stories. There are some exceptions, of course. I'll read MC books by Susan Fanetti or Paula Marinaro. I enjoyed some of Kristen Ashley's earlier books. I like J.D. Robb. I liked Deanna Raybourn's books. It's been ages since I read a Jordan Silver book. No matter how smutty and trashy I'll still read new releases from Kaitlyn O'Connor and Laurann Dohner. I do miss Charlotte Boyett-Compo, I liked her Reaper series. I'm always on the lookout for a new author to try,
I miss Charlotte Boyett-Compo, too. The other day all of her books came up on my Ammy feed. Guess her kids/estate are keeping the books coming. You and I already have them, but maybe someone new will discover her.
I still primarily read PNR, dystopian and Sci-fi. I don't read as many insta-lust stories as I have in the past. I go more for a good story with a strong romantic element as opposed to a book about sex with little story. I'm a bit more selective than I was in the past. I never was a big fan of YA, NA, historicals, BDSM, second chances, motorcycle clubs or mafia stories. There are some exceptions, of course. I'll read MC books by Susan Fanetti or Paula Marinaro. I enjoyed some of Kristen Ashley's earlier books. I like J.D. Robb. I liked Deanna Raybourn's books. It's been ages since I read a Jordan Silver book. No matter how smutty and trashy I'll still read new releases from Kaitlyn O'Connor and Laurann Dohner. I do miss Charlotte Boyett-Compo, I liked her Reaper series. I'm always on the lookout for a new author to try,
I miss Charlotte Boyett-Compo, too. The other day all of her books came up on my Ammy feed. Guess her kids/estate are keeping the books coming. You and I already have them, but maybe someone new will discover her.
~Linda~
I think those are the same books that have been on Ammy since CBC passed away. I have to double check but I think I have them all, if not I'm going to 1-click while I can. I used to buy them from EC. I remember one year Fictionwise had a 70% off Christmas day sale and I bought a ton of books. I downloaded and backed them all up so I have them all. I do wish her heirs would consider re-publishing her books. She was always an auto buy for me.
Here's what I wrote in my introduction on the board back in 2017 ~
"I'm a long time (LONG time) reader of romance. I started with Georgette Heyer and Barbara Cartland back in the seventies (along with Valley of the Dolls and Sydney Sheldon and James Michener and basically any book that came my way). I read the first JD Robb book when it was published along with books by JAK, Elizabeth Lowell, LaVyrle Spencer, and more.
These days I read romances of many flavors ~ historical, contemporary, new adult, m/m, paranormal, fantasy, alien, and so on.
I read in other genres, too, but romance has long been my favorite."
I'd say that my tastes have changed; I'd also agree that there are many more types of romances commonly available today than in the seventies.
I think I'm reading significantly more non-romances today than I was in 2017. I read a good number of space opera and urban fantasy books. Admittedly, I'm always happy when they contain a romantic element.
As I still read primarily historical romances, I guess my taste hasn't changed much. I still love Georgette Heyer as much as I did when I first discovered her years ago. And Jane Austen, of course. I'm much more particular about what I read, however. I try to pick well-written stories that use appropriate language for the setting, like The Governess by Mary Kingswood. This was a quiet, sweet story with an average-looking hero, without shoulders out to here and not the tallest guy in the room, but kind, honorable and desperately in love with the heroine despite his dominating mother's opposition. But then I do like stories about heroes with shoulders out to here and the tallest guy in the room, like Vanessa Kelly's The Highlander Who Protected Me which was great, IMO.
I'm not really sure if my tastes have changed or not. I have always been drawn to the HEA/HFN books over non fiction, the genre was not important as long as that element was there. My reading has expanded with the different categories being introduced. My memory may be failing me but I don't really remember some of the sub categories being mainstream available in the small rural community I lived in during the 60's/70's. We had the horror, thriller/adventure, gothic, historical and contemporary stories. But the shifter, male/male romances, space operas (with romance) were not there.
The only exception? I am not reading as many of the Harlequin series, I find they are too short.
Be careful what you wish for, it might just come true.
My tastes change every few weeks or months. I mostly stick to one kind of book for a while, whether it is by genre, or trope, or writing style. Even my taste regarding clean or erotica goes in cycles. What can I say? I am fickle.
The great thing about this is that, when I rediscover a trope, I have tons of new books that have come out (hopefully), AND I have tons of old books to reread. The bad thing of course, is that I lose track of which books I liked and which not, so there are books I remember that I can't find, and books that I forgot out of self-preservation that I try again.
All in all though, it is a good time to be a romance reader!
omnivore dont think of it as fickle - think of it as flexible and enjoying a variety of genres
I started of as HQ only Then Silhouette, bodice rippers, and historical. Now I switch it up. I'll read a few books in 1 trope then find something else. I love some of the really edgy dark books but then need to follow those up with the light fluff of HQ type books.