Post by Banana Boat on Oct 24, 2017 10:35:55 GMT -7
Hi ml, That's what makes thing so interesting, everyone sees things so differently. I very seldom review a book because I know I'm only seeing one side and someone else will do a much better job than I'm able. Also, I think I'd tend to go on and on just babbling. And you're right, at the end of The Dukes Holiday the H&h will be madly in love and find their rudeness as a form of love-play. 🎃
Hi ml, That's what makes thing so interesting, everyone sees things so differently. I very seldom review a book because I know I'm only seeing one side and someone else will do a much better job than I'm able. Also, I think I'd tend to go on and on just babbling. And you're right, at the end of The Dukes Holiday the H&h will be madly in love and find their rudeness as a form of love-play. 🎃
BB----Doubtful others write better book reviews than you. You are smart, witty and observant & could write any book reviews you wanted. And as a retired RN, you could dazzle your fellow readers w/ science expertise. On Ammy I only got one snarky comment on a book review, so I count myself lucky.
Post by imabookaddict on Apr 6, 2018 19:15:52 GMT -7
I love reading reviews for books. Good, bad, indifferent ... makes no difference. I especially love reviews with spoilers. I mean, come on, some of those reviews are as good as or even better than the book itself. But yes I must admit that sometimes it's the negative reviews that pull me in. Yes like others I have found books that fit my own favorite situations, but sometimes it's some other phrase in the review. My most frequent 'I have to check this out' trigger is . . . 'This book is a trainwreck'.
Why is it, the more books I read the taller my tbr stack gets?
I find negative reviews often much more helpful then good ones. It's good to know what people enjoy about a book, but it's so easy to forget the stuff you didn't like all that much if you loved the book overall. Glowing review too often gloss over the wonky parts. I like to read the bad review and see if I'm put off by the issues those people had, or if I'm still interested in the book.
Though I'm personally a rather critical reviewer, even if I like the book, I still try to mention all things I wasn't impressed with or that surprised me.
Post by imabookaddict on Apr 7, 2018 6:06:51 GMT -7
sakuko said
Though I'm personally a rather critical reviewer, even if I like the book, I still try to mention all things I wasn't impressed with or that surprised me.
Thank you. I love the complete reviews where they give you both good and bad. Makes it easier to decide if I want to read a book or not.
Last Edit: Apr 7, 2018 6:08:35 GMT -7 by imabookaddict
Why is it, the more books I read the taller my tbr stack gets?
I love reading reviews for books. Good, bad, indifferent ... makes no difference. I especially love reviews with spoilers. I mean, come on, some of those reviews are as good as or even better than the book itself. But yes I must admit that sometimes it's the negative reviews that pull me in. Yes like others I have found books that fit my own favorite situations, but sometimes it's some other phrase in the review. My most frequent 'I have to check this out' trigger is . . . 'This book is a trainwreck'.
Imabookaddict----
Like your avatar! If I haven't welcomed you already, welcome to the forum!
Some of the negative books reviews have saved me time, $, & frustration. I have 150+ reviews on GR and I note spoilers for domestic violence and when the H or h is TSTL. Some of the books are corny, have insta-love or insta-lust OR the logic is screwy. I hate when the H chases abaddie for most of the book and then lets him go at the end, or let's a guy get away w/ murder b/c it could cause a family scandal to involve the magistrate. Where is the logic in letting a murderer free?